This can ultimately lead to burnout and attrition in the medical workforce. The omission of these women doctors’ titles (or “untitling”) is subtle, but these remarks accumulate among other experiences of bias in medical settings into what Santhosh and colleague Leah Witt described as “death by a thousand cuts” in an accompanying commentary of the study in JAMA. “Women physicians are in this impossible bind of running behind on clinical work… in the context of working so hard, spending so much more time and taking such care to craft a reply to each one of these messages, to then get a dismissive reply with your first name is quite jarring,” she said. Previous work has found women physicians already receive a higher volume of patient messages than their male colleagues, spending more time after hours catching up on these messages.
Exclusive analysis of biotech, pharma, and the life sciences Learn MoreĪnother study author, Yul Yang, noted that the electronic health record messaging platform offered an “unfiltered look into dynamics that haven’t been addressed very well,” where other research methods such as video recording and post-appointment surveys risk influencing patients’ behavior during the process.įor Lekshmi Santhosh, an associate professor of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine at UCSF, the study underscores the inequitable and often uncompensated nature of working in the electronic medical record.
0 kommentar(er)
